Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DUDAI v. SPISAK et al.

CARLEY, Judge.

Appellant-mother brings a direct appeal from an order awarding appellee-grandparents visitation rights to her child. "OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) and (d) (Code Ann. § 6-701.1) provides that appeals from judgments awarding or refusing to change child custody shall be by application in the nature of a petition to the appropriate appellate court filed with the clerk of that court within 30 days of the entry of the order. This court has held that appeals from orders dealing with child custody which are not filed pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (Code Ann. § 6-701.1) must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [Cit.]" Jones v. Warrenfells, 166 Ga. App. 519 ( 305 S.E.2d 147) (1983). "Visitation privileges are, of course, part of custody. [Cit.]" Ledford v. Bowers, 248 Ga. 804, 805 ( 286 S.E.2d 293) (1982). It is clear that the instant case is an appeal awarding appellees child custody rights. As such, the instant appeal is subject to OCGA § 5-6-35 and must be dismissed for failure to comply with the procedure established by that statute.

Appeal dismissed. Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 12, 1984 — REHEARING DENIED APRIL 27, 1984 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUDAI v. SPISAK
(Apr 12, 1984)