AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DANIEL M. VINNIK et al., Respondents, v. 795 FIFTH AVENUE CORPORATION et al., Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division and for the reasons stated by that court ( 94 A.D.2d 685) that the documents submitted by defendants on their motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], pars 1, 7) are not sufficient, without more, to constitute a defense to the causes of action alleged in the complaint warranting its dismissal.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VINNIK v. 795 FIFTH AVENUE CORPORATION
(May 3, 1984)