AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ROBERT HELLER, Respondent, v. U.S. SUZUKI MOTOR CORP., Appellant, and JIM MORONEY'S HARLEY-DAVIDSON SALES, INC., Respondent.

In a breach of warranty action, defendant U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp. (Suzuki) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ferraro, J.), dated September 20, 1983, which granted plaintiff's motion to dismiss Suzuki's affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations, and denied Suzuki's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it based on its Statute of Limitations defense. ¶ Order reversed, on the law, with costs, plaintiff's motion denied and defendant Suzuki's cross motion granted. ¶ The action against Suzuki, the manufacturer of a motorcycle, for breach of warranty, commenced more than four years after Suzuki sold the motorcycle, was untimely as a matter of law (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-725; Doyle v Happy Tumbler Wash-O-Mat, 90 A.D.2d 366; Fazio v Ford Motor Corp., 69 A.D.2d 896). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor and Boyers, JJ., concur. [ 120 Misc.2d 321.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HELLER v. U.S. SUZUKI MOTOR CORP
(May 7, 1984)