AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BANK LEUMI TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SANFORD ROSS MANAGEMENT, LTD., et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, County of New York (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered on December 7, 1983, which adjudged defendants Sanford Ross Management, Ltd., and Sanford Ross liable to plaintiff Bank Leumi Trust Company of New York in the amount of $137,355.89, together with interest of $3,192.18 and $135 for costs and disbursements, for a total of $140,683.07, is modified, on the law, to the extent of increasing the interest allowed to the sum of $14,902.88, and otherwise affirmed, with costs or disbursements. ¶ The law is well established that when a contract or commercial instrument states that interest shall be paid at a specified rate until the principal debt is extinguished, then the contract rate, rather than the statutory rate, governs the rate of interest applicable after maturity and until the contract is merged into a judgment. ( Metropolitan Sav. Bank v Tuttle, 290 N.Y. 497; Astoria Fed. Sav. Loan Assn. v Rambalakos, 49 A.D.2d 715; Stull v Joseph Feld, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 655.) Since the instruments herein provide for interest at the contract rate until the principal balance is paid, plaintiff is entitled to interest in the amount of $14,902.88.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Carro, Milonas and Alexander, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANK LEUMI TRUST CO. v. SANFORD ROSS MGMT
(May 15, 1984)