AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

RUTH E. TERRY et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF HUNTINGTON, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated February 14, 1983, affirmed, with costs. ¶ As this court has very recently stated, a class action against governmental bodies and agencies is generally not the superior method for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy (CPLR 901, subd a, par 5), since any determination would, by virtue of the principle of stare decisis, be binding on the governmental body and automatically benefit all persons in the class claimed to be represented regardless of whether they were made plaintiffs in the action through the vehicle of a class action (see Oak Beach v Town of Babylon, 100 A.D.2d 930; see, also, Suffolk Housing Servs. v Town of Brookhaven, 69 A.D.2d 242, 248-249, app dsmd 49 N.Y.2d 799). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TERRY v. TOWN OF HUNTINGTON
(May 14, 1984)