Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PANTASOTE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Pantasote Company, appeals the Tax Court's rulings upholding the Passaic County Board of Taxation's judgment sustaining the 1979 real property tax assessment on its industrial facility in the City of Passaic and the tax assessor's 1980 and 1981 tax assessments on that property. The Tax Court judge concluded that Pantasote did not establish a value at variance with the assessments and did not overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the assessments and the county board judgment.

We affirm substantially for the reasons given by Judge Hopkins in his written decision reported at 6 N.J. Tax 34 (Tax Ct. 1983).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PANTASOTE CO. v. PASSAIC
(Jun 6, 1984)