Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GRANT et al. v. MINSON.

BENHAM, Judge.

Appellee Minson purchased certain property at a foreclosure sale and, after unsuccessfully demanding that appellants vacate the premises, filed a dispossessory action in the Municipal Court of Chatham County. Appellants then filed an action in superior court asking that the foreclosure be set aside. After a hearing, the superior court judge denied appellants the relief they sought. Subsequently, the municipal court heard argument on the issuance of the dispossessory warrant and entered judgment against appellants. They now appeal, contending that they never received notice of the pending foreclosure. However, the issue of notice was not before the municipal court and played no part in its judgment authorizing the issuance of the writ of possession. The issue of notice to the debtor of the initiation of foreclosure proceedings is one of foreclosure (see OCGA §§ 44-14-162.1 through 44-14-162.3) and has no place in a dispossessory proceeding. Furthermore, it appears from the scant record before us that the notice issue was never raised in the court below. Therefore, there is nothing for this court to review. See Young v. Jones, 149 Ga. App. 819 (3) ( 256 S.E.2d 58) (1979).

Judgment affirmed. Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 25, 1984.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRANT v. MINSON
(Jun 25, 1984)