AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

ERWIN PEARL, INC., Appellant, v. BURROUGHS CORPORATION, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 98 A.D.2d 619). We would add only that plaintiff's affidavit on its motion to reargue failed to establish the merit of its case (see Canter v Mulnick, 60 N.Y.2d 689).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ERWIN PEARL, INC. v. BURROUGHS CORPORATION
(Jul 2, 1984)