Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HOULIHAN PARNES REALTORS, Appellant, v. LAZAR GAZIVODA, Respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of the facts (CPLR 5613) and other issues not reached by that court. The proof adduced by plaintiff was legally sufficient to support the jury's verdict awarding recovery by plaintiff of the broker's commission for which the action was brought. There remains to be determined, however, defendant's claim of errors in the trial court's instructions to the jury, as to some of which at least, no sufficient objection was made at trial.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOULIHAN PARNES REALTORS v. GAZIVODA
(Jul 5, 1984)