AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

CARL BISBEE et al., Respondents, v. CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORP. et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: On this summary judgment motion Special Term erred by determining property rights in the absence of necessary parties. Because the Spachts claimed an interest in oil and gas rights to the real property of plaintiffs, they are necessary parties "who might be inequitably affected by a judgment in the action" (CPLR 1001, subd [a]; see Williams v. Somers, 91 A.D.2d 545). The parties should be permitted to add the necessary parties or to consolidate this action with a pending action in which the Spachts are parties, and to address the issue whether the clause in the deed from the Federal Land Bank to the Spachts relating to gas and oil rights was a covenant running with the land.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BISBEE v. CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORP
(Jul 13, 1984)