AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HEALTH GROUP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, etc., Plaintiff, v. WALKER COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, INC., etc., Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiff undertook to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court as implicating the diverse citizenships of the parties and the matter in controversy. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1), (c). Its allegations are defective, in that it alleges that it has "a" principal place of business in a certain state and that the defendant has "its" principal place of business in another state. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c), supra.

"For the purpose of this [§ 1332] section * *, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business. * * *" 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c), supra. [Emphases added here.]

A corporation has one, and only one, principal place of business. Woodbridge Plastics, Inc. v. Borden, Inc., 473 F. Supp. 218, 223 (D.C.N.Y. 1979), aff'd. w/o op. 614 F.2d 1293 (table) (2d Cir. 1979). Alleging the state where "a" place of business of a corporation is located is a fatally insufficient allegation of the state where "its principal place of business" is located. Holman v. Carpenter Technology Corp., 484 F. Supp. 406, 408 (D.C.Pa. 1980), citing inter alia Wymard v. McCloskey Co., 342 F.2d 495, 497[1-3] (3d Cir. 1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 823, 86 S.Ct. 52, 15 L.Ed.2d 68 (1965).

Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended on terms in this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 1653. Within 20 days herefrom, the plaintiff may amend such defective allegation or suffer the dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction of the subject-matter. See Rule 12(h)(3), F.R. Civ.P.

It would be preferable also for the plaintiff to allege specifically that the matter-in-controversy herein exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum of $10,000, although such is apparent from the ad damnum prayer of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Form 2(a), F.R.Civ.P., App. of Forms.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEALTH GROUP MGMT. CO. v. WALKER CTY. MED. CENTER, (M.D.Tenn. 1984)
(Jul 13, 1984)