Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Marriage of COPENHAVER, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, and COPENHAVER, Respondent — Cross-Appellant.

PER CURIAM

This is a dissolution of marriage case. Husband is a circuit court judge. His financial circumstances — and, thus, the merits of this case — may have been significantly altered by an enactment of Or Laws 1983, ch 770, but it is not possible on this record to determine just what the effect of that measure is. This is, therefore, the rare case in which, in order to do justice between the parties, remand is necessary. See Sands and Sands, 64 Or. App. 570, 669 P.2d 358 (1983).

Remanded for further proceedings. Costs to neither party.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF COPENHAVER
(Aug 1, 1984)