FRANCHISE TAX BD. v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 80-5700.

Attorney(S)

Jeffrey M. Vesely, Los Angeles,
, for Employment Development
Franchise Tax Bd. David Epstein,
of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Postal

Judges

Mary Murphy Schroeder
Stephen Roy Reinhardt

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 80-5700.

Attorney(S)

Jeffrey M. Vesely, Los Angeles,
, for Employment Development
Franchise Tax Bd. David Epstein,
of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Postal

Judges

Mary Murphy Schroeder
Stephen Roy Reinhardt

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Franchise Tax Board of California v. United States Postal Service, ___ U.S. ___, 104 S.Ct. 2549, 81 L.Ed.2d 446 (1984).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Comments