STATE v. POWELL, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( John H. Stamler, Union County Prosecutor, attorney
Brian D. Gillet, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel
on the brief). Edward P. Hannigan, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent ( Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney). Patricia E. Stern, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General ( Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney
Linda J. Wharton
Allan J. Nodes, Deputy Attorneys General, of counsel
Linda J. Wharton, on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( John H. Stamler, Union County Prosecutor, attorney
Brian D. Gillet, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel
on the brief). Edward P. Hannigan, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent ( Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney). Patricia E. Stern, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General ( Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney
Linda J. Wharton
Allan J. Nodes, Deputy Attorneys General, of counsel
Linda J. Wharton, on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PATRICK JAMES POWELL,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Shebell, reported at 197 N.J. Super. 191, 194 (1983).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 7.

For affirmance — none.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE v. POWELL

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PATRICK JAMES POWELL,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments