Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

NEW CASTLE SIDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. HORACE WOLFSON et al., Defendants, and WAYNETT A. SOBERS, JR., Appellant, and DAVID SMITH, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Appellant, whose cross claim is asserted in his individual capacity, seeks to recover for the delinquent taxes and penalties he has paid on behalf of the corporation and for loans made to the corporation above and beyond his initial investment. The former were made in appellant's capacity as an officer or employee of the corporation (see U.S. Code, tit 26, § 6671, subd [b]; § 6672; Tax Law, §§ 1085, 1131, 1134) and would be the result of respondent's negligence, if any, in discharging his obligations to the corporation for which he would not be responsible to a stockholder (cf. White v Guarente, 43 N.Y.2d 356). In making the loans, appellant acted as a general creditor of the corporation, to whom it is well settled that no duty is owed by an accountant (see Ultramares Corp. v Touche, 255 N.Y. 170). Thus, in neither case can appellant, as an individual shareholder, have recovery against respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur; Judge WACHTLER taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEW CASTLE SIDING CO. v. WOLFSON
(Oct 9, 1984)