Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's claim, that his video-taped statement was involuntary because at the time he made such statement he was suffering from narcotics withdrawal, was raised for the first time on this appeal and, thus, has not been preserved for review (see People v Dancey, 57 N.Y.2d 1033). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.