AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ERNEST HOLZBERG, Appellant, v. BERNARD E. FEUERSTEIN, Respondent, et al., Defendant, et al., Inter

Judgment affirmed.

Respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Trial Term properly dismissed the second cause of action of the amended complaint wherein plaintiff alleged that he was entitled to a fee based on quantum meruit for services rendered in connection with the trial of an action in which he represented defendant Feuerstein as plaintiff under a contingent fee agreement. That trial ended in a judgment of dismissal against Feuerstein. After judgment was rendered, Feuerstein hired new attorneys who prosecuted an appeal and subsequently settled the action. Plaintiff is not entitled to a fee based on a percentage of the proceeds of the settlement because his contingent fee agreement made no reference to an appeal and the attorney-client relationship terminated after the judgment of dismissal was rendered (see Vitale v La Cour, 92 A.D.2d 892).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Weinstein, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLZBERG v. FEUERSTEIN
(Oct 22, 1984)