AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD CASTRECHINO, Appellant.

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for a suppression hearing. Memorandum: Defendant was charged with two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree when the automobile in which he was a passenger was stopped and searched by police who found a loaded .38 caliber handgun in the trunk. His pretrial motion to suppress was denied by the suppression court, without a hearing, on the ground that he lacked standing. After a jury trial, defendant was convicted as charged. Although the "automatic standing" rule has been abrogated ( United States v Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83; People v Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160), a person charged with a possessory crime is entitled to the constitutional guarantees against unreasonable searches and seizures when he can demonstrate a reasonable expectation of privacy in the invaded place ( United States v Salvucci, supra, p. 93; People v Ponder, supra, p. 166). The record indicates that the lawful owner of the automobile had entrusted it to defendant's possession several days previously for needed repairs. As a garageman or repairman, defendant had lawful possession of the car (cf. People v Weeden, 89 A.D.2d 814) so as to give him a reasonable expectation of privacy (see People v Robinson, 121 Misc.2d 267, 269-270). Accordingly, defendant has standing to contest the search and seizure and denial of the motion to suppress without a hearing was error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CASTRECHINO
(Nov 7, 1984)