AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

DOUGLAS F. PARKS et al., Respondents, v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Punitive damages are not recoverable in an action against an insurance company based upon a claim of wrongful and bad-faith refusal to pay under the terms of a policy of fire insurance. Allegations of breach of an insurance contract, even a breach committed willfully and without justification, are insufficient to authorize such recovery ( Uniland Dev. Co. v Home Ins. Co., 97 A.D.2d 973; Reifenstein v Allstate Ins. Co., 92 A.D.2d 715). Since plaintiffs' action is grounded upon private breach of contract and does not seek to vindicate a public right or deter morally culpable conduct, the second cause of action should be dismissed ( Halpin v Prudential Ins. Co., 48 N.Y.2d 906, 907; LTS Contrs. v Hartford Ins. Co., 99 A.D.2d 644, 645). Contrary to Special Term's finding, Gordon v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. ( 30 N.Y.2d 427, cert den. 410 U.S. 931) and similar cases do not hold otherwise ( Halpin v Prudential Ins. Co., supra, p. 907).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PARKS v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO
(Nov 7, 1984)