Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GAIL SANDRA COHAN, APPELLANT, v. VAUGHN DENNIS COHAN, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant/wife's contention that the trial court erred in receiving ex parte evidence affecting her duties as a custodial parent. We, therefore, strike paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order since there is no competent evidence to support them. See In the Interest of Brown, 246 So.2d 166 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

The order in all other respects is affirmed as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COHAN v. COHAN
(Nov 6, 1984)