AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

UP-FRONT INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Respondents, v. U.S. INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellants.

Order affirmed, with costs. The trial court's charge on consequential damages, that the jury was to calculate damages on the basis of actual sales and "testimony about projected sales" plaintiffs would have made during the three years following defendants' breach of contract, was not excepted to and, therefore, became the law applicable to the determination of the case ( Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 N.Y.2d 162). The propriety of this instruction was not preserved for our review.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS. Taking no part: Judge KAYE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UP-FRONT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. U.S. INDUSTRIES, INC
(Nov 15, 1984)