Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

H.T., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency under review is reversed for a new hearing because the lower court improperly failed to hold a Richardson hearing prior to admitting incriminating statements allegedly made by the respondent and not previously revealed by the state in discovery. Cumbie v. State, 345 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1977); Balboa v. State, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The state's contentions that the defense was on prior notice of the statements, see Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla. 1978), or acquiesced in the court's ruling, see Lucas v. State, 376 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1979), are totally unsustained by the record.

Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

H.T. v. STATE
(Dec 3, 1984)