AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM BROWNE, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant's guilt was established by direct as well as circumstantial evidence that was sufficient to eliminate all innocent hypotheses ( People v. Kennedy, 47 N.Y.2d 196, 202). The evidence included a statement defendant made to a detective on the telephone, essentially admitting that he stabbed the victim. A proper foundation was laid for introduction of this statement, upon which the jury could conclude that defendant was the speaker ( People v. Lynes, 49 N.Y.2d 286, 291-292). Defendant was not in custody and, in any event, volunteered the inculpatory statement; hence no Miranda warnings were required ( Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 478; People v. Rodney P., 21 N.Y.2d 1).

We have examined defendant's other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BROWNE
(Dec 17, 1984)