Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Ex parte SOUTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF GENERAL SERVICES, Petitioner. In reACTA-FAX BUSINESS MACHINES, Appellant-Petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINAPROCUREMENT REVIEW PANEL and Royal Business Machines, Inc., Respondents.and MONROE SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS, Appellant-Petitioner,

ORDER

Dec. 17, 1984.

All parties in this matter have petitioned the Court to determine the scope of authority of the South Carolina Procurement Review Panel.

The Procurement Review Panel was created by the legislature to serve as an advisory body to the Budget and Control Board in protests arising under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 11-35-4210, 11-35-4220, and 11-35-4230 (Supp. 1983). It has no authority to make or rescind contracts, or to order the Division of General Services to do so. In protests arising under § 11-35-4210, the Panel is empowered only to determine whether an unsuccessful bidder should have been awarded a contract, and to make recommendations to the Budget and Control Board for relief to the aggrieved bidder. § 11-35-4210(7); § 11-35-4410(5) (Supp. 1983). Additionally, § 11-35-4210(6) provides that "the request for a review shall not stay the contract unless fraudulent."

It is therefore ordered that the portion of the Procurement Review Board's order of determination dated October 25, 1984, which purported to rescind existing contracts and to substitute Royal Business Machines, Inc., as contractor, is void.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EX PARTE DIVISION OF GENERAL SERVICES
(Dec 17, 1984)