AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

EDWARD DUNAY, Respondent-Appellant, v. LADENBURG, THALMANN Co., INC., et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Plaintiff and defendants Ronald B. Koenig (Koenig) and Stephen S. Weisglass (Weisglass) in 1974 entered into a joint venture, named LTRA, which engaged in the stock brokerage business. LTRA was dissolved in April, 1979. Shortly thereafter plaintiff commenced the instant action. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges, inter alia, that the defendants, including Koenig and Weisglass, breached their fiduciary duty to him, by causing the dissolution of LTRA and appropriating for their own benefit LTRA's business, business relationships and business opportunities. Now, plaintiff seeks by a notice to produce (CPLR 3120), inter alia, documents created by the defendants after 1979. Defendants moved for a protective order. Special Term granted it, as to those post-1979 documents.

We disagree. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the documents in issue are relevant and material since a breach of a fiduciary duty is a continuing one and survives the dissolution of a joint venture ( Jones Co. v. Burke, 306 N.Y. 172, 192). Further, if plaintiff is successful, he would be entitled to a share of the proceeds of the successor venture.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Fein and Kassal, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUNAY v. LADENBURG, THALMANN CO., INC
(Dec 18, 1984)