Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ETHEL K. CLARK, EMPLOYEE v. AMERICAN AND EFIRD MILLS, EMPLOYER AND AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, CARRIER

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The Industrial Commission is to determine on remand whether claimant has an occupational disease and whether claimant is disabled as a result thereof in light of the factors enumerated in this Court's opinion in Rutledge v. Tultex Corporation, 308 N.C. 85, 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983).

Affirmed.

Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLARK v. AMERICAN EFIRD MILLS
(Jan 1, 1985)