Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

QUIGLEY et al. v. WOODALL et al.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59 of this court.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, C. J., who concurs specially and Smith, J., not participating.

DECIDED JANUARY 7, 1985.

HILL, Chief Justice, concurring specially.

I write simply to point out that, in my view, when neighbors of rezoned property seek to show that the rezoning power is being manifestly abused to the oppression of the neighbors, see Cross v. Hall County, 238 Ga. 709, 711 ( 235 S.E.2d 379) (1977), they must do so by objective evidence, not the subjective intent of the county commissioners, and hence the taking of the depositions of the county commissioners is unnecessary.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

QUIGLEY v. WOODALL
(Jan 7, 1985)