AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of PHYLLIS HARSTEIN, on Behalf of JULIE S., Respondent, v. MIKE S., Appellant.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements; no appeal lies as of right from an order of filiation entered in a proceeding in which an order of support is requested (Family Ct Act, § 1112; Matter of Jane PP. v. Paul QQ., 64 N.Y.2d 15; Matter of Susan W. v. Amhad Q., 65 A.D.2d 594).

The notice of appeal is deemed an application for leave to appeal from the order of filiation dated July 26, 1983. Leave to appeal granted (see Family Ct Act, § 1112, subd [a]).

Upon appeal by permission, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Appellant's paternity was established by clear and convincing evidence. HLA test results indicated there is a 96.1% probability that appellant is the child's father and the hearing court credited the testimony of the child's mother as to the essential elements of proof necessary to sustain the petition (see Matter of Department of Social Servs. v. Jay W., 105 A.D.2d 19). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HARSTEIN v. MIKE
(Jan 14, 1985)