AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

FRANK OLSHANSKY, Appellant, v. BERNARD RAVERA et al., Respondents.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, with costs, and motion granted to the extent of precluding defendants from offering any proof as to the items as to which disclosure was sought, unless plaintiff's demand for disclosure is complied with by defendants. Defendants' time to so comply is extended until 10 days after service upon defendants of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Defendants have failed to offer any satisfactory excuse for ignoring plaintiff's demand for disclosure. By ignoring that demand and failing to properly respond to the instant application, defendants have engaged in dilatory tactics resulting in inordinate delay. Such conduct is inexcusable and warrants the relief granted herein (see Donner v. 50 Tom Corp., 99 A.D.2d 504; see, also, Kramme v. Town of Hempstead, 100 A.D.2d 447, 451; Baumann v. Dee, 100 A.D.2d 504; Ferraro v. Koncal Assoc., 97 A.D.2d 429). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLSHANSKY v. RAVERA
(Jan 22, 1985)