Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). Defendant's contentions that the charge was deficient, that he was prejudiced by the court's failure to marshal the evidence, and that the prosecutor's summation contained improprieties are unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, lack merit. We further find that defendant was accorded the effective assistance of counsel (see Strickland v. Washington, 466 US ___, 104 S Ct 2052; People v Wagner, 104 A.D.2d 457).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and Niehoff, JJ., concur.