AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HELEN LINDSTROM BERNARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

STOKER, Judge.

For the reasons set out in Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Bernard, 458 So.2d 981 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1984), the judgment in favor of defendant, Helen Lindstrom Bernard, and against Faustina Pipe Line Company for just compensation is reduced from $2,929.32 to $1,545.70. The judgment against Faustina Pipe Line Company ordering it to pay the expert fee of Mr. Sam Kennedy is reduced from $2,400 to $1,500, it being understood that the total fee fixed for Mr. Sam Kennedy in this and the case with which it is consolidated is $1,500 and a payment thereof will satisfy both judgments in this respect.

The judgment against Faustina Pipe Line Company ordering it to pay attorney's fees in the amount of $3,900 is reversed. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to defendants-appellees.

AFFIRMED IN PART, AMENDED IN PART AND AFFIRMED AS AMENDED, AND REVERSED IN PART.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAUSTINA PIPE LINE CO. v. BERNARD
(Jan 25, 1985)