NOSS CO. v. UNITED STATES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Appeal No. 84-1255.

Attorney(S)

Mark D. Crames, Sandler Travis, P.C., Miami,
, argued for
Kenneth N. Wolf,
of Justice, New York City, argued for
With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting
, David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director
Joseph I. Liebman,
in Charge
Trade Field Office, New York

Judges

Phillip Benjamin Baldwin

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Appeal No. 84-1255.

Attorney(S)

Mark D. Crames, Sandler Travis, P.C., Miami,
, argued for
Kenneth N. Wolf,
of Justice, New York City, argued for
With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting
, David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director
Joseph I. Liebman,
in Charge
Trade Field Office, New York

Judges

Phillip Benjamin Baldwin

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

NOSS CO., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE.

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that certain imported centrifugal cleaning machines called Radiclones were properly classified under item 661.95 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.

OPINION

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Court of International Trade. Noss Co. v. United States, 588 F. Supp. 1408 (C.I.T. 1984).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

NOSS CO., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE.

Comments