KALMAN FLOOR CO., INC. v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant ( Apruzzese McDermott, Mastro Murphy, attorneys). Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. ( Conway Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys). Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt ( Amdur Friedrich, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant ( Apruzzese McDermott, Mastro Murphy, attorneys). Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. ( Conway Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys). Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt ( Amdur Friedrich, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT ANDTHIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 16 (1984).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.