Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY DUMAS, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction in this cause, reported below as Dumas v. State, 439 So.2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), on the basis of conflict with Cirio v. State, 440 So.2d 650 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), and Johnson v. State, 411 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Upon further review, we find that there is no conflict because of the distinctive factual circumstances in the instant case, and, consequently, no basis for this Court to accept jurisdiction. The petition for review is denied.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUMAS v. STATE
(Jan 31, 1985)