Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, and order affirmed, with one bill of costs.
We find that Special Term's awards of maintenance, child support, and counsel fees constituted a proper exercise of its discretion ( see, Silver v Silver, 63 A.D.2d 1017; Smith v Smith, 61 A.D.2d 1133). We also find that contrary to the defendant husband's claim, Special Term sufficiently set forth the factors it considered in rendering its maintenance and child support awards (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; [7] [b]; cf. Hornbeck v Hornbeck, 99 A.D.2d 851; Nielsen v Nielsen, 91 A.D.2d 1016). Titone, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and O'Connor, JJ., concur.