AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTOINE SUTTON and EUGENE HARRIS, Appellants.

Judgments affirmed.

Although certain inconsistencies appear in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, and the complaining witness himself had a criminal record, "resolution of credibility * * * [was] properly for the trier of fact" ( People v La Borde, 76 A.D.2d 869, 870; People v Rosenfeld, 93 A.D.2d 872). We are "traditionally resistant to second-guessing [a] determination on this issue" ( People v Di Girolamo, 108 A.D.2d 755), and the facts adduced in the case at bar "do not compel the conclusion that a reasonable doubt existed as a matter of law" ( People v La Borde, supra, p 870). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SUTTON, HARRIS
(Feb 25, 1985)