AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM THOMPSON, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant's guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt ( People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). He waived his right to challenge the officer's failure to preserve the handwritten notes of said officer, listing the denominations and serial numbers of the buy money, when he subsequently pleaded guilty to the remaining counts of the indictment ( People v Manzo, 99 A.D.2d 817). The prosecutor did not withhold any information from the Grand Jury which would have materially influenced its investigation ( see, People v Monroe, 125 Misc.2d 550; People v Filis, 87 Misc.2d 1067). The sentence imposed was not excessive in light of the large quantities of marihuana recovered by the police.

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Titone, J.P., O'Connor, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. THOMPSON
(Feb 25, 1985)