AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

NORMAN WESLER, Appellant, v. ROBERT A. KASSL et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) NORMAN WESLER, Appellant,

Judgments affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in excluding from evidence certain articles of clothing and gear worn by him on the day of the alleged incident. The admission or exclusion of real or demonstrative evidence rests largely within the discretion of the trial court ( Riddle v. Memorial Hosp., 43 A.D.2d 750). Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion.

Plaintiff's further claims of error in the jury charge are without merit. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WESLER v. KASSL
(Mar 4, 1985)