Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERT BRADLEY AND TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. JAMES HIGH, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Bradley and Travelers Indemnity Company appeal a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict awarding damages to High in this action arising out of an automobile accident. High's vehicle was struck by a truck owned by Bradley, but driven by Bradley's brother. Appellants defended the action brought by High on the ground that they incurred no liability because Bradley's brother was not authorized to use the truck and had stolen it from his brother.

We affirm upon a holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury verdict. See Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 349 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 1977); Bermil Corp. v. Sawyer, 353 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Circumstantial evidence was appropriate to prove that Bradley knew of or consented to the use of his truck by his brother. See Nielsen v. City of Sarasota, 117 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1960); Bunyak v. Clyde J. Yancey Sons Dairy, 438 So.2d 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), review denied, 447 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1984). It was the jury's function to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses and to reject testimony it deemed unworthy of belief. See Povia v. Melvin, 66 So.2d 494 (Fla. 1953); S. Kornreich Sons v. Titan Agencies, 423 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRADLEY v. HIGH
(Mar 5, 1985)