Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Bentley Kassal at the Appellate Division ( 102 A.D.2d 388) to which we add only that plaintiff's attempt in this court to characterize the services it rendered as outside the scope of Real Property Law § 442-d is inconsistent with the allegation in its amended complaint that it earned its claimed commission by "procuring a purchaser for the Property".
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.