Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DENNIS BRUGMAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We need not decide whether the proceedings before the Medical Board warrant a departure from the general rule of issue preclusion. The plaintiff had a full and fair opportunity to be heard. He had no occasion for cross-examination; his was the only evidence before the board. He admitted on argument that he had no other evidence to present and was unaware of any evidence that might be discoverable. The issue of the cause of his medical condition is thus precluded by the board's determination.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and LYNCH concur; Judge ALEXANDER taking no part.

Designated pursuant to N Y Constitution, article VI, § 2.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRUGMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Mar 28, 1985)