Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JOHN J. LYONS, Respondent, v. CATES CONSULTING ANALYSTS, INC., Appellant.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff's motion for summary judgment ( 88 A.D.2d 526). In view of defendant's concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LYONS v. CATES CONSULTING ANALYSTS
(Apr 2, 1985)