Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

HOWARD J. HOSSMAN, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), v. STATE OF INDIANA, APPELLEE (PLAINTIFF BELOW).

OPINION ON REHEARING

CONOVER, Judge.

The State of Indiana has filed a Petition for Rehearing which correctly points out our statement the defendant was acquitted of the burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary charges is incorrect. In fact, the jury hung as to these charges. Accordingly, we have corrected this error by amending our original statement of facts in this regard. 473 N.E.2d 1059 (Ind. App. 1985).

This amendment does not, however, lead to a contrary result. Given a hung jury, it is patently obvious the evidence was insufficient for the conviction of Hossman as to those two charges.

Excepting the above, the Petition for Rehearing is in all other respects denied.

MILLER, P.J., and YOUNG, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOSSMAN v. STATE
(Apr 1, 1985)