AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES HYDE, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as it must be at this stage ( People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied ___ US ___, 105 S Ct 327), it is plain that the evidence adduced at trial established that defendant was guilty of the charges of which he was convicted.

The sentence of 25 years to life imposed for felony murder was not an abuse of discretion by the sentencing Judge, and the facts of this case do not warrant our substituting our discretion for that of the sentencing Judge ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Gibbons, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HYDE
(Apr 8, 1985)