Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY v. LEACH.

BELL, Justice.

When Terry Leach failed to appear at the call of his lawsuit for trial, counsel for defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. (hereinafter, Aetna) moved to dismiss his complaint. The superior court granted the motion, dismissing the complaint "with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41 (b)." The Court of Appeals reversed, on the ground that, under the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 9-11-41 (b), Ga. L. 1982, p. 784 (eff. Nov. 1, 1982), trial courts are no longer authorized by § 9-11-41 (b) to enter dismissals with prejudice for the failure of the plaintiff to prosecute. Leach v. Aetna Cas. c. Co., 172 Ga. App. 785 ( 324 S.E.2d 494) (1984). We granted Aetna's application for a writ of certiorari, in order to review the holding of the Court of Appeals. For the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals' opinion, we agree with the court's holding, and affirm.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED APRIL 16, 1985.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY v. LEACH
(Apr 16, 1985)