AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JONATHAN NATHAN, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled to a mistrial predicated upon his own contumacious behavior ( see, Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 505, n 2; Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337; United States v Bentvena, 319 F.2d 916, cert denied sub nom. Ormento v. United States, 375 U.S. 940; People v. Epps, 37 N.Y.2d 343, cert denied 423 U.S. 999; People v. Palermo, 32 N.Y.2d 222).

Defendant's contention that the court should have dismissed counts five, nine and eleven of the indictment because they were lesser included offenses of count one does not have any merit (CPL 1.20; see, People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61; People v Perez, 45 N.Y.2d 204; People v. Acevedo, 40 N.Y.2d 701). Lazer, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Brown, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NATHAN
(Apr 22, 1985)