Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRIEDA JOYCE JOHNSON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HORTON WINFIELD JOHNSON, FOR HERSELF AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF KEVIN LEE NIX, CYNTHIA ANNE JOHNSON AND TAMARA JOYCE NIX, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION [2] (Opinion January 10, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 749 F.2d 1530)

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc entered on March 26, 1985, 758 F.2d 660, and the prior panel's opinion are hereby VACATED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
(Apr 24, 1985)