AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES NORMAN, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

The record adequately supports the determination made after a Wade/Mapp hearing denying that branch of defendant's pretrial motion which sought suppression of complainant's in-court identification of defendant, based upon a sufficient independent basis to identify defendant ( see, People v. Pleasant, 54 N.Y.2d 972; United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463). In addition, the hearing court properly found that defendant lacked standing to challenge a search of the stolen automobile from which he was taken upon his illegal arrest ( People v. McCloud, 81 A.D.2d 645, 646; see also, People v. Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160; People v. Butler, 90 A.D.2d 797; United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83). Consequently, defendant has failed to show an appropriate ground for reversal of the judgment. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NORMAN
(Apr 22, 1985)