Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOWELL P. PEREAU, JR., Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for so much of the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court as holds that the jury could infer defendant's intent to rape from his conduct and the surrounding circumstances ( People v Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 301) and could find that he acted to "carry the project forward within dangerous proximity to the criminal end to be attained" ( People v Werblow, 241 N.Y. 55, 61). We also agree that it was not error under these circumstances for the trial court to refuse to charge the misdemeanor of coercion in the second degree as a lesser included offense of the felony of coercion in the first degree ( People v Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61; People v Discala, 45 N.Y. 38, 42-43).

The defendant's other contentions are either unpreserved or without merit.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PEREAU
(Apr 23, 1985)