AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

LARRY LEATHERWOOD, APPELLANT, v. ROYAL OAKS RENTALS, A COMPANY, ROYAL OAKS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, FREDERICK H. MILLER, AND ST. JEAN ROOFING, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, APPELLEES.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our per curiam affirmance of December 19, 1984, and reverse the order quashing service on Royal Oaks Rentals. A motion alleging a defect in personal jurisdiction should set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate the defect in service and how the defect can be cured. See Bodden v. Young, 422 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Over 30 Association v. Blatt, 118 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

We remand for further proceedings below.

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

HURLEY, J., dissents without opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEATHERWOOD v. ROYAL OAKS RENTALS
(May 8, 1985)